![\"\"](\"https:\/\/kmsnews.org\/kms\/assests\/2026\/06\/Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-5.49.22-PM.png\")
Abdul Samad<\/p>\nAbdul Samad<\/p>\n
Imran Hussain MP\u2019s recent intervention in the UK Parliament on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) follows a familiar pattern of selective outrage. By highlighting alleged arrests, communication curbs and \u201clockdowns,\u201d the MP presents a one-sided account that overlooks the sequence of events which compelled authorities to act. What began as protests over subsidies and commodity prices gradually escalated into sustained disruption of public life, forcing the state to restore order rather than permit anarchy.<\/p>\n
Public order is not an optional extra in any functioning society. When demonstrations block highways for days, prevent students from reaching examinations, shut down hospitals and markets, and threaten essential supply lines, governments have both the right and duty to intervene. The measures taken in AJK\u2014temporary restrictions on movement in sensitive areas and calibrated limits on communications\u2014were neither blanket nor indefinite. They were responses to concrete threats against citizens\u2019 daily existence, not pre-emptive repression.<\/p>\n
Claims of a total \u201clockdown\u201d or communications \u201cblackout\u201d exaggerate the situation for external consumption. Mobile and internet services were restored progressively once the immediate risk of coordinated violence and rumour-mongering subsided. Such steps mirror actions taken by democracies worldwide when protests threaten to spiral out of control. The difference lies in the narrative framing: similar measures elsewhere are described as necessary crowd control; in AJK they are instantly labelled human-rights violations.<\/p>\n
Equally important is the silence surrounding the victims of prolonged unrest. Ordinary Kashmiris\u2014shopkeepers, daily-wage labourers, schoolchildren and patients\u2014bore the heaviest cost. Their right to earn a livelihood, receive education and access healthcare was subordinated to the demands of organised agitators. Responsible commentary must weigh these competing rights rather than champion only those who shout loudest on social media.<\/p>\n
It is also worth noting that AJK\u2019s elected government has repeatedly offered dialogue. Successive administrations have engaged with traders, transporters and political groups on subsidy mechanisms, electricity tariffs and development packages. Many of the current grievances stem from fiscal pressures that affect the entire country, not from unique political persecution. Framing every administrative decision as evidence of authoritarianism distorts this broader economic context.<\/p>\n
External voices amplifying unverified activist claims carry their own responsibility. When parliamentarians repeat narratives supplied by narrow interest groups without independent verification, they risk incentivising further confrontation. Constructive international engagement would instead encourage all sides to return to negotiations inside existing constitutional frameworks. AJK already possesses functioning legislative and judicial institutions; these, not foreign megaphones, remain the proper venues for redress.<\/p>\n
The portrayal of routine law-enforcement as systematic repression also ignores the restraint shown by security forces. Despite weeks of roadblocks and occasional violence, the response has remained measured, with emphasis on de-escalation once calm returned. This stands in contrast to the maximalist rhetoric that labels any arrest\u2014regardless of due process\u2014as political victimisation.<\/p>\n
Ultimately, AJK\u2019s challenges are best addressed through pragmatic governance and economic measures, not political theatre staged in Westminster. The people of the region deserve sustained attention to infrastructure, employment and service delivery, not recycled slogans that ignore local agency and institutional progress. Responsible observers, whether inside or outside Pakistan, should support fact-based dialogue over partisan amplification of disruption. Only then can stability and development advance together.<\/p>\n
Write is a Kashmari journalist based in Azad Kashmir and can be reached. asamad@gmail.com<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Abdul Samad Imran Hussain MP\u2019s recent intervention in the UK Parliament on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) follows a familiar pattern of selective outrage. By highlighting alleged arrests, communication curbs and \u201clockdowns,\u201d the MP presents a one-sided account that overlooks the sequence of events which compelled authorities to act. What began as protests over subsidies …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":203264,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t