Martian Wallet offers a secure way to manage your digital assets. It's easy to use, provides top-notch security, and supports multiple cryptocurrencies. Att spela på ett casino utan svensk licens innebär att du får friheten att spela utan Spelpaus och med fler valmöjligheter, så att du enkelt kan registrera dig och börja njuta av ett brett utbud av spelalternativ utan tidsbegränsningar Explore phantomx.at to download the Phantom Wallet extension. Securely manage Solana assets, trade NFTs, and unlock DeFi opportunities with a user-friendly interface! блэкспрут ссылкамега ссылка blacksprut ссылкаblacksprut ссылка
India

Indian SC criticizes Mumbai college for hijab ban, stays dress code directive

New Delhi: The Indian Supreme Court on Friday criticized a Mumbai college for enforcing a ban on students wearing burqa, hijab, or niqab on campus, and issued an interim order staying the controversial directive.

According to Kashmir Media Service, the college, NG Acharya and DK Marathe College of Arts, Science and Commerce in Chembur, had issued the ban as part of a new dress code, which had been upheld by the Bombay High Court earlier. The High Court had stated that the directive aimed to prevent the disclosure of a student’s religion, thereby allowing them to focus solely on their education.

A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and PV Sanjay Kumar, while hearing the petition challenging the ban, expressed strong reservations about the college’s rationale. “How are you empowering women by telling them what to wear? Where is the choice for the woman? You have suddenly woken up to the fact that they are wearing it. It is unfortunate that these things are being said after so many years of independence, and you say religion is there in this country,” Justice Kumar remarked.

The court partially stayed the college’s directive, specifically the clause that prohibited hijabs, caps, and badges on campus. The Bench issued notice on the petition and scheduled further hearings for the week commencing November 18. “We hope and trust this interim order is not misused by anybody,” the court cautioned.

The petitioners, represented by Senior Advocate Colin Gonsalves, argued that the students had been wearing the hijab for four years without issue, and that the ban had led to them being barred from attending classes. Gonsalves emphasized that only a small number of Muslim students—three out of 441—had expressed a desire to wear the hijab, underscoring that the college’s ban was unnecessary and discriminatory.

In response, Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan, representing the college, defended the ban, stating that the niqab created a barrier to interaction and that the college sought to maintain uniformity among students. However, the court was unconvinced, questioning why the decision was made abruptly and whether similar restrictions would apply to other religious symbols, such as tilaks or bindis.

Justice Kumar further commented that such rule-making by educational institutions must stop, highlighting the importance of allowing students the freedom to choose their attire, especially when it does not disrupt the learning environment.

The Supreme Court’s stay on the dress code directive offers temporary relief to the students, with the case set to continue in the coming weeks.

Read also

Back to top button