Martian Wallet offers a secure way to manage your digital assets. It's easy to use, provides top-notch security, and supports multiple cryptocurrencies. Att spela på ett casino utan svensk licens innebär att du får friheten att spela utan Spelpaus och med fler valmöjligheter, så att du enkelt kan registrera dig och börja njuta av ett brett utbud av spelalternativ utan tidsbegränsningar
IIOJK in focus

Indian police attach GPS tracking device on two more bailed-out Kashmiris in IIOJK

Srinagar: Indian police authorities, in utter violation of freedom of movement and right to privacy, have affixed Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on two more bailed-out Kashmiris in Baramulla district of Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

According to Kashmir Media Service, the police affixed the GPS anklet on the two under-trial Kashmiri youth who were enlarged on bail. They were illegally arrested under the draconian Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) in the Sopore area of the district.

The police officers have given it a legal cover by claiming that they were complying with the court order, adding the GPS anklet would be used to monitor the all daily lives movement of the under-trial youth.

This is not the first time that the Indian authorities have affixed GPS tracking systems on the Kashmiris. A day earlier the police in Baramulla affixed such a system on an under-trial Kashmiri who was enlarged on bail after he was booked under the draconian UAPA in Uri Police Station. The first victim of India’s novel punishment is an elderly Kashmiri, Ghulam Muhammad Butt, a resident of Srinagar. The 65-year-old Ghulam Mohammad Butt has been walking with the tracker around his ankle since November 2023.

Human rights activists, while expressing serious concern on putting a GPS tracker on the body of a person facing trial in IIOJK, said the GPS anklet is a form of ‘virtual imprisonment’.

They said that electronic tagging fitted to the body of a person may raise issues of fundamental liberties, such as freedom of movement or a person’s right to privacy. “Given that it is used against undertrial people, it relies on the logic that one is guilty until proven innocent. That is injustice”, they added.

Read also

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button