Rafale over Su-57: Did India prioritize strategic gains or payoffs?
New Delhi: The Indian Air Force’s (IAF) decision to purchase the French Rafale fighter jet over the Russian Su-57 has sparked controversy and raised questions about the role of bribery or strategic interest in the multi-billion dollar deal.
According to Kashmir Media Service, despite NATO countries rejecting the Rafale, India opted for the French fighter, citing its superior performance and strategic ties with France.
The Rafale, developed by France after withdrawing from the Eurofighter Typhoon project, has proven its mettle against top NATO and US fighters. However, India’s choice of Rafale over the Su-57 has sparked debate. India had initially partnered with Russia to develop a 5G fighter but withdrew due to disagreements over features and supply chain issues.
Critics argue that the Rafale’s higher price and inferior capabilities compared to the Su-57 make India’s purchase questionable. The government has defended the decision, citing the need for a superior fighter to counter regional threats. The controversy surrounding the Rafale deal continues to simmer, with many calling for a review of the contract. K
